Start typing and press Enter to search

Trending Topic: Medical Marijuana in the Workplace

Trending Topic: Medical Marijuana in the Workplace

Even in states where marijuana is legal, organizations may maintain zero-tolerance workplace policies and thus take appropriate action when an employee is high while on duty…

How accommodating do you have to be of medical marijuana use at your company? There is no simple answer amidst a complex network of rules. Click through for an introduction to this important and controversial workplace issue.

A workplace drug screening that turned up marijuana use typically was an offense that could prevent someone from getting a job or result in job dismissal. This tended to apply even to employees who used cannabis for medical reasons, as opposed to purely recreational use. But the situation has changed, and today employers face a confusing patchwork of federal, state and local laws, and the consequences of a positive test aren’t always so clear.

Federal & State Laws

At the federal level, marijuana is still illegal. So, while the Americans with Disabilities Act requires that you make reasonable accommodations for qualified workers with disabilities, if anyone is possessing and using marijuana, it’s still a federal crime, regardless of state law. This means that under the ADA, you don’t need to accommodate marijuana use for approved medical reasons.

But the state situation isn’t so clear. Thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medical reasons. With conflicting federal and state laws, what do you do when a drug screening turns up evidence that a candidate or an employee has used marijuana?

Rules have evolved and jurisdictions have passed stronger protections for marijuana users who turn to cannabis as a treatment option for various health conditions. Emerging laws and court rulings make it clear that you must assess how you’re going to approach your employees’ permissible pot use and make changes to your policies and processes to stay in compliance.

No law obligates employers to accept marijuana use or impairment on the job. Even in states where marijuana is legal, organizations may maintain zero-tolerance workplace policies and thus take appropriate action when an employee is high while on duty.

A growing number of states are writing employment protections into their marijuana legalization statutes. Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia provide employment protections for medical marijuana patients. Note that cannabis rules are always changing, so be sure to check for the latest update in your jurisdiction.

These statutes prohibit discrimination against off-duty cannabis use or require employers to accommodate its use for medical reasons. But the statutes generally make exceptions for use by employees in certain safety-sensitive or federally regulated positions.

HR Policies

So then, what about your own policies? An employer’s drug-testing and drug screening practices must comply with emerging laws in relevant states, even though all marijuana use is still illegal at the federal level. In states that cover medical marijuana patients under disability laws, employers should confirm whether positive drug tests are connected to medicinal use before making employment decisions.

Recent court decisions serve as an important lesson for employers: Don’t discriminate against marijuana users simply because the drug is illegal at the federal level. That is no longer a tenable position.

Per SHRM, employers can lean on traditional HR practices by ensuring that a worker who seeks an accommodation for medical use has the appropriate medical certification — a written statement from the prescribing physician that clearly states that the duties of the position in question have been reviewed and the doctor believes the person can safely perform the tasks. However, the worker understands to refrain from on-duty use and not pose a risk in the workplace.

Employers can consider their own business needs and revise their policies — ending zero-tolerance drug testing but maintaining zero-tolerance drug-free workplace practices — turning to legal counsel to examine and amend processes.

Copyright © 2020

 
 

Reply a Comment

SUBSCRIBE

GENERAL DISCLAIMER

This blog is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and cannot constitute legal advice, because the authors are not licensed attorneys. Readers should not rely or act upon any information presented on this blog without seeking professional legal counsel. The views expressed in each post are those of the author, and the author alone; they are not the views of Ahola. The information provided in this blog is general, and based on information available as of the date of publishing. Information herein is provided on an “as is” or “as available” basis; we make no warranty of any kind to you regarding the information provided and disclaim any liability for damages from use of the blog or its content. Please consult an attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular question or issue.